Text Size

A 6-Month Study Comparing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% versus Each of Its Individual Preservative-Free Components

Pfeiffer N., Traverso C.E., Lorenz K., Saarela V., Liinamaa J., Uusitalo H., Astakhov Y., Boiko E., Ropo A.


  • 2014
  • Advances in Therapy
View publication
  • Therapeutic Area

    Glaucoma

  • Categories

    Clinical development

  • Affiliations

    Department of Ophthalmology, Mainz University Medical Center, Langenbeckstr. 1, Mainz, 55101, Germany; Clinica Oculistica, Di.N.O.G.M.I., University of Genoa, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tampere and TAUH Eye Center, Tampere, Finland; First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Santen Oy, Clinical Research and Medical Affairs, Helsinki, Finland

Related Publications

Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension: The Randomized Phase III PEONY Trial

Wang T.H.; Aung T.; Lu D.-W.; George R.; Senthil S.; Lu F.; Odani-Kawabata N.; Park K.H.


Efficacy and Safety of a Preservative-Free Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Concurrent Ocular Surface Disease: A Randomized Phase 2 Study.

Bacharach, Jason; McLaurin, Eugene B.; Silverstein, Steven; Amrane, Mourad; Garrigue, Jean-Sebastien; Ismail, Dahlia; Flynn, William J.; Catiolanze Phase 2 study group


Assessment of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor on Retinal Structure and Visual Function in Rodent Models of Optic Nerve Crush

Taniguchi T.; Sharif N.A.; Ota T.; Farjo R.A.; Rausch R.


Can't find what you're looking for?

Contact us

Document number: NP-No product-EMEA-0110
Date of preparation: February 2022